The Risk of Losing Central Bank Credibility — and How Portfolios Can Prepare
Quick Take
Fed independence is critical: Political interference risks credibility, raising the odds of higher inflation and greater market volatility.
History is clear: From the U.S. in the 1970s to Turkey and Argentina more recently, political pressure on central banks has led to inflation and instability.
Portfolios can prepare: Diversification, TIPS, and global exposure provide effective protection against unexpected policy or inflation shocks.
A New Challenge for the Fed
Over the past month, the White House has stepped up pressure on the Federal Reserve, seeking to influence monetary policy decisions. Traditionally, interest rate policy has been left solely to the Fed’s Federal Open Market Committee — a group of seven Senate-confirmed governors and a rotating set of eleven regional Fed bank presidents.
While the Fed has always faced criticism, this recent campaign marks the most overt political pressure in modern history. It threatens to chip away at the hard-earned credibility of the central bank. If that independence is lost, the fallout could mean higher inflation risks, elevated long-term interest rates, and rattled financial markets.
We don’t see this as the most likely outcome — but it’s a risk worth considering when building a resilient portfolio.
Cautionary Tales
Former Fed Chair Ben Bernanke captured the stakes clearly in 2010:
“Policymakers in a central bank subject to short-term political influence may face pressures to overstimulate the economy to achieve short-term gains… Such gains may be popular at first… but they are not sustainable and soon evaporate, leaving behind only inflationary pressures.”
His conclusion was blunt: political interference creates “undesirable boom-bust cycles” that weaken both stability and growth.
History provides plenty of evidence. In the 1960s and 1970s, Presidents Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon leaned heavily on Fed Chairs William McChesney Martin and Arthur Burns to keep interest rates low. Nixon, in particular, pressed Burns to hold down rates ahead of the 1972 election. The result was a surge in inflation that spiraled through the decade, producing “stagflation” — stagnant growth paired with soaring prices. It eroded household purchasing power, destabilized businesses, and shook global confidence in U.S. economic leadership.
It took Paul Volcker, a fiercely independent Fed chair, to restore credibility in the early 1980s. He drove interest rates to punishing levels to crush inflation, defying political pressure in the process. The lesson was clear: short-term political meddling may win votes, but it often leaves behind long-term economic damage.
Lessons from Abroad
The pattern is not uniquely American.
Turkey (2010s–2020s): President Erdoğan’s pressure to cut rates despite soaring inflation sent the lira to historic lows. Investor trust evaporated, inflation surged, and capital fled.
Argentina (multiple episodes): Central bank subservience to political regimes entrenched hyperinflation, wiped out savings, and fueled repeated sovereign defaults.
Across borders and decades, the truth is consistent: when central banks bend to politics, inflation rises, volatility deepens, and growth suffers.
Federal Reserve Credibility
For now, markets show little sign of worry. Inflation expectations embedded in bond prices point to inflation staying near the Fed’s long-term target over the next decade.
Even after the turmoil of the post-Covid economy, market-based long-run inflation expectations, and remain stable. That resilience reflects the Fed’s strong institutional framework — and suggests investors still believe the central bank can act decisively to keep inflation in check.
Portfolio Implications
A loss of central bank credibility is unlikely — but it’s exactly the kind of “tail risk” investors should prepare for. A well-diversified portfolio is designed to withstand a wide range of scenarios, including surprise inflation.
Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS): Unlike standard Treasury bonds, which lose value when inflation rises unexpectedly, TIPS adjust both principal and interest payments with the Consumer Price Index. That structure helps preserve purchasing power and real returns. TIPS tend to outperform when inflation runs hotter than expected, making them a valuable hedge against shocks. With real yields still historically elevated, they offer inexpensive insurance.
Global diversification: Non-dollar assets help offset the risk of a weaker U.S. dollar. International equities spread exposure across different currencies, economies, and monetary regimes. History shows that globally diversified portfolios often hold up better during periods of U.S. inflation and volatility.
Markets and corporations will always face political turmoil, wars, recessions, and crises. Yet, time and again, they adapt and recover — because human progress, corporate innovation, and economic resilience ultimately prevail.
What It All Means
For investors, Fed independence isn’t just a policy debate in Washington — it’s a cornerstone of financial stability. History shows that when central banks yield to politics, the result is higher inflation, greater volatility, and weaker growth. By contrast, independence anchors expectations, preserves purchasing power, and supports long-term wealth creation.
Politics will always be unpredictable. Portfolio discipline doesn’t have to be. By blending inflation hedges, high-quality fixed income, and global diversification, investors can reduce reliance on any single policy outcome — and protect long-term returns.
Contact us at 865-584-1850 or info@proffittgoodson.com
DISCLOSURES: The information provided in this letter is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered an individualized recommendation of any particular security, strategy, or investment product, and should not be construed as investment, legal, or tax advice. Proffitt & Goodson, Inc. makes no warranties with regard to the information or results obtained by third parties and its use and disclaims any liability arising out of, or reliance on the information. The information is subject to change and, although based on information that Proffitt & Goodson, Inc. considers reliable, it is not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness. Source information is obtained from independent financial data suppliers (Interactive Data Corporation, Morningstar, etc.). The Market Categories illustrated in this Financial Market Summary are indexes of specific equity, fixed income, or other categories. An index reflects the underlying securities in a particular selection of securities picked due to a particular type of investment. These indexes account for the reinvestment of dividends and other income but do not account for any transaction, custody, tax, or management fees encountered in real life. To that extent, these index numbers are artificial and cannot be duplicated in real life due to the necessity of paying those transaction, custody, tax, and management fees. Industry and specific sector returns (technology, utilities, etc.) do not account for the reinvestment of dividends or other income. Future events will cause these historical rates of return to be different in the future with the potential for loss as well as profit. Specific indexes may change their definition of particular security types included over time. These indexes reflect investments for a limited period of time and do not reflect performance in different economic or market cycles and are not intended to reflect the actual outcomes of any client of Proffitt & Goodson, Inc. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
